Mejora de los resultados y optimización de la atención sanitaria. Clínicamente demostrado.

Sistema de supervisión y drenaje torácico digital Thopaz+

Siga el camino de la innovación para los drenajes torácicos

Common complications after lung surgery

Complicaciones habituales tras una cirugía pulmonar

Thopaz+ de Medela lleva la terapia de drenaje torácico a un nuevo nivel de atención sanitaria

Thopaz+, unlike analogue systems, it reliably regulates the applied pressure at the patient’s chest and digitally (and quietly) monitors critical therapy indicators. Clinical data has demonstrated that Medela’s chest drainage therapy improves outcomes and streamlines the delivery of care. The ClotStop® catheters are made of silicone, which ensures easy and safe placement in the thorax. The unique ClotStop® coating helps minimize the risk of clots sticking to the surface and therefore the occlu - sion of the catheter and increases patient comfort.

¿Le interesa? Siga leyendo para obtener más información acerca de las ventajas de Thopaz+

Descubra lo que Thopaz+ puede ofrecerle


1 Danitsch D. Benefits of Digital Thoracic Drainage Systems. Nurs times 2012;108(11):16–7.

2 Manzanet G, Vela A, Corell R, et al. A Hydrodynamic Study of Pleural Drainage Systems: Some Practical Consequences. Chest 2005;127(6):2211–21.

3 Aguayo E, Cameron R, Dobaria V et al. Assessment of differential pressures in chest drainage systems: Is what you see what you get? J Surg Res 2018;232: 464–9.

4 Refai M, Brunelli A, Varela G, et al. The Values of Intrapleural Pressure Before the Removal of Chest Tube in Non-Complicated Pulmonary Lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41(4):831–3.

5 Brunelli A, Salati M, Pompili C, et al. Regulated Tailored Suction vs Regulated Seal A Prospective Randomized Trial on Air Leak Duration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43(5):899–904.

6 Hashmi U, Nadeem M, Aleem A, et al. Dysfunctional Closed Chest Drainage – Common Causative Factors and Recommendations for Prevention. Cureus 2018;10(3):e2295.

7 Rathinam S, Bradley A, Cantlin T, et al. Thopaz Portable suction Systems in Thoracic Surgery: An end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;6:59.

8 McGuire AL, Petrcich W, Maziak DE, et al. Digital versus analogue pleural drainage phase 1: prospective evaluation of interobserver reliability in the assessment of pulmonary air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):403–7.

9 Varela G, Jiménez MF, Novoa NM, et al. Postoperative chest tube management: measuring air leak using an electronic device decreases variability in the clinical practice. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35(1):28–31.

10 Cerfolio RJ, Varela G, Brunelli A. Digital and Smart Chest Drainage Systems to Monitor Air Leaks: The Birth of a New Era? Thorac Surg Clin 2010;20(3):413–20.

11 Liberman M, Muzikansky A, Wright CD, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors of Persistent Air Leak After Major Pulmonary Resection and Use of Chemical Pleurodesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89(3):891–8.

12 Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, et al. Predictors of Prolonged Air Leak After Pulmonary Lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77(4):1205–10.

13 Takamochi K, Imashimizu K, Fukui M, et al. Utility of Objective Chest Tube Management After Pulmonary Resection Using a Digital Drainage System. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104:275-83.

14 Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, et al. Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Lung Surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;55(1):91–115.

15 Day D. Keeping Patients Safe During Intrahospital Transport. Crit Care Nurs 2010;30(4):18–32.

16 Al-Tarshihi MI, Khamash FA, Ellatif A. Thoracostomy tube complications and pitfalls: An experience at a tertiary level military hospital. Rawal Med J 2008;33(2).

17 Zhou  J, Lyu M, Chen N, et al. Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis. E J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;54(4):635–43.

18 Hsu T, Ryherd E, Waye KP, et al. Noise Pollution in Hospitals: Impact on Patients. Journal of Clinical Outcome Management 2012;19(7):301–9.

19 Kam PC, Kam AC, Thompson JF. Noise Pollution in the Anaesthetic and Intensive Care Environment. Anaesthesia 1994;49(11):982–6.

20 Sihoe A, Fang V, Liu L, et al. 2019.Objective and patient-reported outcomes after lung resection surgery are improved by digital chest drainage systems compared to traditional water seal systems: Results from a prospective multicenter database in China. Poster presented at ESTS 2019, Dublin.

21 Hayes LJ, O’Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, et al. Nurse Turnover: A Literature Review – An Update. Int J Nurs Stud 2012;49(7):887–905.

22 Kalisch B, Lee H, Rochman M. Nursing Staff Teamwork and Job Satisfaction. J Nurs Manag 2010;18(8):938–47.

23 Mier JM, Molins L, Fibla JJ. The benefits of digital air leak assessment after pulmonary resection: prospective and comparative study. Cir Esp 2010;87(6):385–9.

24 National Institute for Health Excellence. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains. Medical technologies guidance [MTG37]. 2018. Internet: (downloaded on 21.01.2019).

25 Geroge RS, Papagiannopoulos K. Advances in chest drain management in thoracic disease. J Thorac Dis 2016;8(Suppl 1): S55–S64.

26 Pompili C, Brunelli A, Salati M, et al. Impact of the learning curve in the use of a novel electronic chest drainage system after pulmonary lobectomy: a case-matched analysis on the duration of chest tube usage. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;13(5):490–3.

27 eComment. Air Leak: The Importance of Being Consistent. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):408.

28 Pompili C, Detterbeck F, Papagiannopoulos K, et al. Multicenter International Randomized Comparison of Objective and Subjective Outcomes Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98(2):490–7.

29  Evans JM, Ray A, Dale M, et al. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019;17(3):285–94.