Mejora de los resultados y optimización de la atención sanitaria. Clínicamente demostrado.
Sistema de supervisión y drenaje torácico digital Thopaz+
Siga el camino de la innovación para los drenajes torácicosSistema de supervisión y drenaje torácico digital Thopaz+
Siga el camino de la innovación para los drenajes torácicos1 Danitsch, D. Benefits of Digital Thoracic Drainage Systems. Nurs times 2012;108(11):16–7.
2 Manzanet, G., Vela, A., Corell, R. et al. A Hydrodynamic Study of Pleural Drainage Systems: Some Practical Consequences. Chest 2005;127(6):2211–21.
3 Aguayo, E., Cameron, R., Dobaria, V. et al. Assessment of differential pressures in chest drainage systems: Is what you see what you get? J Surg Res 2018;232: 464–9.
4 Refai, M., Brunelli, A., Varela, G. et al. The Values of Intrapleural Pressure Before the Removal of Chest Tube in Non-Complicated Pulmonary Lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41(4):831–3.
5 Brunelli, A., Salati, M., Pompili, C. et al. Regulated Tailored Suction vs Regulated Seal A Prospective Randomized Trial on Air Leak Duration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43(5):899–904.
6 Hashmi, U., Nadeem, M., Aleem, A. et al. Dysfunctional Closed Chest Drainage – Common Causative Factors and Recommendations for Prevention. Cureus 2018;10(3):e2295.
7 Rathinam, S., Bradley, A., Cantlin, T. et al. Thopaz Portable suction Systems in Thoracic Surgery: An end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;6:59.
8 McGuire, A.L., Petrcich, W., Maziak, D.E. et al. Digital versus analogue pleural drainage phase 1: prospective evaluation of interobserver reliability in the assessment of pulmonary air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):403–7.
9 Varela, G., Jiménez, M.F., Novoa, N.M. et al. Postoperative chest tube management: measuring air leak using an electronic device decreases variability in the clinical practice. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35(1):28–31.
10 Cerfolio, R.J., Varela, G., Brunelli, A. Digital and Smart Chest Drainage Systems to Monitor Air Leaks: The Birth of a New Era? Thorac Surg Clin 2010;20(3):413–20.
11 Liberman, M., Muzikansky, A., Wright, C.D. et al. Incidence and Risk Factors of Persistent Air Leak After Major Pulmonary Resection and Use of Chemical Pleurodesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89(3):891–8.
12 Brunelli, A., Monteverde, M., Borri, A. et al. Predictors of Prolonged Air Leak After Pulmonary Lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77(4):1205–10
8 McGuire, A.L., Petrcich, W., Maziak, D.E. et al. Digital versus analogue pleural drainage phase 1: prospective evaluation of interobserver reliability in the assessment of pulmonary air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):403–7.
13 Takamochi, K., Imashimizu, K., Fukui, M. et al. Utility of Objective Chest Tube Management After Pulmonary Resection Using a Digital Drainage System. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:275–83.
14 Batchelor, T.J.P., Rasburn, N.J., Abdelnour-Berchtold, E. et al. Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Lung Surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;55(1):91–115.
7 Rathinam, S., Bradley, A., Cantlin, T. et al. Thopaz Portable suction Systems in Thoracic Surgery: An end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 6:59.
14 Batchelor, T.J.P., Rasburn, N.J., Abdelnour-Berchtold, E. et al. Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Lung Surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;55(1):91–115.
15 Day, D. Keeping Patients Safe During Intrahospital Transport. Crit Care Nurs 2010;30(4):18–32.
16 Al-Tarshihi, M.I., Khamash, F.A., Ellatif, A. Thoracostomy tube complications and pitfalls: An experience at a tertiary level military hospital. Rawal Med J 2008;33(2).
17 Zhou, J., Lyu, M., Chen, N., et al. Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis. E J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;54(4):635–43.
18 Hsu, T., Ryherd, E., Waye, K.P. et al. Noise Pollution in Hospitals: Impact on Patients. Journal of Clinical Outcome Management 2012;19(7):301–9.
19 Kam, P.C., Kam, A.C., Thompson, J.F. Noise Pollution in the Anaesthetic and Intensive Care Environment. Anaesthesia 1994;49(11):982–6.
7 Rathinam, S., Bradley, A., Cantlin, T. et al. Thopaz Portable suction Systems in Thoracic Surgery: An end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 6.59.
20 Sihoe, A., Fang, V., Liu, L. et al. 2019.Objective and patient-reported outcomes after lung resection surgery are improved by digital chest drainage systems compared to traditional water seal systems: Results from a prospective multicenter database in China. Póster presentado en el ESTS 2019, Dublín.
7 Rathinam, S., Bradley, A., Cantlin, T. et al. Thopaz Portable suction Systems in Thoracic Surgery: An end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 6:59.
21 Hayes, L.J., O’Brien-Pallas, L., Duffield, C. et al. Nurse Turnover: A Literature Review – An Update. Int J Nurs Stud 2012;49(7):887–905.
22 Kalisch, B., Lee, H., Rochman, M. Nursing Staff Teamwork and Job Satisfaction. J Nurs Manag 2010;18(8):938–47.
7 Rathinam, S., Bradley, A., Cantlin, T. et al. Thopaz Portable suction Systems in Thoracic Surgery: An end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;6:59.
8 McGuire, A.L., Petrcich, W., Maziak, D.E. et al. Digital versus analogue pleural drainage phase 1: prospective evaluation of interobserver reliability in the assessment of pulmonary air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):403–7.
14 Batchelor, T.J.P., Rasburn, N.J., Abdelnour-Berchtold, E. et al. Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Lung Surgery: Recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;55(1):91–115.
23 Mier, J.M., Molins, L., Fibla, J.J. The benefits of digital air leak assessment after pulmonary resection: prospective and comparative study. Cir Esp 2010;87(6):385–9.
24 National Institute for Health Excellence. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains. Medical technologies guidance [MTG37]. 2018. Internet: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/MTG37 (descargado el 21.01.2019).
25 Geroge, R.S., Papagiannopoulos, K. Advances in chest drain management in thoracic disease. J Thorac Dis 2016;8(Suppl 1): S55–S64.
26 Pompili, C., Brunelli, A., Salati, M. et al. Impact of the learning curve in the use of a novel electronic chest drainage system after pulmonary lobectomy: a case-matched analysis on the duration of chest tube usage. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;13(5):490–3.
8 McGuire, A.L., Petrcich, W., Maziak, D.E. et al. Digital versus analogue pleural drainage phase 1: prospective evaluation of interobserver reliability in the assessment of pulmonary air leaks. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):403–7.
24 National Institute for Health Excellence. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains. Medical technologies guidance [MTG37]. 2018. Internet: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/MTG37 (descargado el 21.01.2019).
27 eComment. Air Leak: The Importance of Being Consistent. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21(4):408.
24 National Institute for Health Excellence. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains. Medical technologies guidance [MTG37]. 2018. Internet: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/MTG37 (descargado el 21.01.2019).
26 Pompili, C., Brunelli, A., Salati, M. et al. Impact of the learning curve in the use of a novel electronic chest drainage system after pulmonary lobectomy: a case-matched analysis on the duration of chest tube usage. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;13(5):490–3.
28 Pompili, C., Detterbeck, F., Papagiannopoulos, K. et al. Multicenter International Randomized Comparison of Objective and Subjective Outcomes Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98(2):490–7.
29 Evans, J.M., Ray, A., Dale, M. et al. Thopaz+ portable digital system for managing chest drains: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019;17(3):285–94.
A diferencia de los sistemas analógicos, regula de modo fiable la presión aplicada en el tórax del paciente y supervisa de forma digital (y silenciosa) los indicadores clave de la terapia. Los datos clínicos han demostrado que la terapia de drenaje torácico de Medela mejora los resultados y optimiza la administración de la atención sanitaria.